4.2 Article

Assessment of human pancreatic islet architecture and composition by laser scanning confocal microscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 53, Issue 9, Pages 1087-1097

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/jhc.5C6684.2005

Keywords

pancreatic islets; confocal microscopy; architecture; composition

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R21DK062641, R21DK063439, Z01DK062000, R01DK055233, P60DK020593] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-63439, DK-62641, DK-55233, DK20593] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent success of pancreatic islet transplantation has generated considerable enthusiasm. To better understand the quality and characteristics of human islets used for transplantation, we performed detailed analysis of islet architecture and composition using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Human islets from six separate isolations provided by three different islet isolation centers were compared with isolated mouse and non-human primate islets. As expected from histological sections of murine pancreas, in isolated murine islets a and 6 cells resided at the periphery of the p-cell core. However, human islets were markedly different in that alpha, beta, and delta cells were dispersed throughout the islet. This pattern of cell distribution was present in all human islet preparations and islets of various sizes and was also seen in histological sections of human pancreas. The architecture of isolated non-human primate islets was very similar to that of human islets. Using an image analysis program, we calculated the volume of (alpha, beta, and delta cells. In contrast to murine islets, we found that populations of islet cell types varied considerably in human islets. The results indicate that human islets not only are quite heterogeneous in terms of cell composition but also have a substantially different architecture from widely studied murine islets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available