4.7 Article

A linear finite element model to predict processing-induced distortion in FRP laminates

Journal

COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 1666-1674

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.018

Keywords

cure behaviour; residual/internal stress; thermomechanical; forming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manufacturing processes for laminated composites often produce parts whose dimensions do not match the mold from which they were made. This distortion is commonly referred to as 'spring-in'. The amount of spring-in can depend on many factors including the manufacturing process (cure temperature, resin bleed, and applied pressure), the part (geometry, material, thickness, cure shrinkage, thermal expansion and layup sequence), and the tool (surface, thickness and thermal expansion). Much of the current work devoted to spring-in relies on extensive resin characterization. While this approach has been reasonably successful, it does little to assist the designer using material systems that have not been fully characterized (which is not always possible or feasible). This study considers the ability of a linear elastic finite element model to describe and quantify many of the factors contributing to spring-in. The aim of this study is to show that spring-in can be accurately predicted without a complete resin characterization. Numerical predictions based on relatively simple mechanical tests were observed to compare favorably with experimental measurements. Spring-in was dominated by thickness shrinkage, which contributed approximately 3/4 of the measured distortion. The mold stretching contribution diminished with thickness and was negligible for parts thicker than 2.5 mm (0.1 in.). While the material system at hand did not exhibit a fiber volume fraction gradient, its effects were included in the formulation of the model. For materials that have reported a gradient, it was found to account for approximately 10% of the part spring-in. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available