4.2 Article

Hydroxyapatite cement in pediatric craniofacial reconstruction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 129-133

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200501000-00026

Keywords

bone substitute; craniofacial reconstruction; hydroxyapatite cement

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gold standard for closing small cranial defects is autogenous bone: iliac crest, rib, or split calvarial grafts. Autogenous grafts result in donor site morbidity, increased operative time, blood loss, and additional cost, and they are limited in quantity. Hydroxyapatite cements are alternative bone substitutes that eliminate these restrictions. Although the use of hydroxyapatite is well accepted in completely developed crania, its use in the growing pediatric skull is limited. The purpose of the current study was to address the safety and long-term efficacy of this bone substitute for the repair of craniofacial bone defects in the growing pediatric skull. Safety is measured dually by resistance of bone substitute to infection and its tolerability by lack of a foreign body reaction. Efficacy is evaluated as structural skull integrity, volume stability with time, aesthetic quality, and most importantly, the ability to integrate adequately into a growing cranium without subsequent deformity or complications. This is a retrospective review of all pediatric patients at the authors' institution who underwent reconstruction of cranial defects using hydroxyapatite cement between May 1997 and March 2001. Eight patients who underwent 11 operations between the ages of 25 and 100 months (mean, 55 months) were followed up between 23 and 72 months (mean, 38 months). No mortalities or significant morbidities were encountered in the study population. It has been the authors' experience that hydroxyapatite cement is both biocompatible and resistant to infection when used in sites not contiguous with sinus mucosa; and that it is a good alternative to autogenous bone in pediatric craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available