4.5 Article

Dissociable elements of human foresight: a role for the ventromedial frontal lobes in framing the future, but not in discounting future rewards

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 1214-1221

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.018

Keywords

ventromedial prefrontal cortex; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; lesion; decision making; impulsivity; apathy

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01-AG14082] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01-DA14129] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R21 NS045074] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R21NS045074] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG014082] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA014129] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impaired future thinking may be a core aspect of impulsive decision making. Recent efforts to understand the brain processes that underlie impulsivity have suggested a role for the frontal lobes. However, future thinking is unlikely to be a unitary process, and the frontal lobes are not a homogeneous entity. The present study contrasted the effects of dorsolateral and ventromedial frontal lobe damage on two distinct aspects of future thinking in humans. Temporal discounting, the subjective devaluation of reward as a function of delay, is not affected by frontal lobe injury. In contrast, a normal future time perspective (a measure of the length of an individual's self-defined future) depends on the ventromedial, but not dorsolateral, frontal lobes. Furthermore, investigation of the relationship of these two measures with classical symptoms of frontal lobe damage indicates that future time perspective correlates with apathy, not impulsivity. Apathy may deserve more attention in understanding both impaired future thinking and the impaired decision making that may result. (c) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available