4.4 Article

Uncoupling of RNAi from active translation in mammalian cells

Journal

RNA
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 38-44

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.7158605

Keywords

RNA interference (RNAi); small interfering RNA (siRNA); translation; iron responsive element (IRE)

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL074704, R01 HL074704] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R37 AI029329, R01 AI042552, R01 AI029329, AI42552, AI29329] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL074704] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R37AI029329, R01AI029329] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small inhibitory RNAs (siRNAs) are produced from longer RNA duplexes by the RNAse III family member Dicer. The siRNAs function as sequence-specific guides for RNA cleavage or translational inhibition. The precise mechanism by which siRNAs direct the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to find the complementary target mRNA remains a mystery. Some biochemical evidence connects RNAi with translation making attractive the hypothesis that RISC is coupled with the translational apparatus for scanning mRNAs. Such coupling would facilitate rapid alignment of the siRNA antisense with the complementary target sequence. To test this hypothesis we took advantage of a well-characterized translational switch afforded by the ferritin IRE-IRP to analyze RNAi mediated cleavage of a target mRNA in the presence and absence of translation. Our results demonstrate that neither active translation nor unidirectional scanning is required for siRNA mediated target degradation. Our findings demonstrate that nontranslated mRNAs are highly susceptible to RNAi, and blocking scanning from both the 5' and 3' ends of an mRNA does not impede RNAi. Interestingly, RNAi is about threefold more active in the absence of translation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available