4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Transplantation tolerance: gene expression profiles comparing allotolerance vs. allorejection

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 33-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2004.09.009

Keywords

immune tolerance; gene expression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An understanding of the molecular basis of immune regulation will allow development of therapies for diseases caused by immune dysregulation and for therapeutic exploitation of the immune response in transplantation of organ grafts or stem cells. To identify critical regulatory factors in immunity, we have used a mouse model wherein infectious regulatory tolerance is inducible by CD4/CD8 blockade in recipients of vascularised heart grafts. Once established. this transplantation tolerance is robust and isolated tolerant spleen cells show powerful immume regulatory properties, being able to impose donor-specific allotolerance upon fully immune competent naive recipients. Here, we present a compound comparison of four gene arrays (tolerance vs. rejection, at 48 h, and at 123 h) where a relatively small number of differentially expressed genes occurred. In rejection, there was a strong progressive amplification of IFNgamma and granzyme B mRNAs. In tolerance, both ELKL motif kinase and axotrophin occurred in the group of upregulated genes. Mice lacking ELKL motif kinase develop autoimmune disease, whilst axotrophin is a newly discovered stem cell gene that has only been explored in the context of neural development. This gene expression data is the first to demonstrate a link between axotrophin and regulatory tolerance and. since axotrophin, LIF, STAT3 and c-kit each function in stem cells, we propose that common mechanisms play a central role both in developmental regulation of stem cells, and in immune regulation. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available