4.5 Article

Effect of pamidronate on bone turnover and implant migration after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.06.004

Keywords

pamidronate; total hip arthroplasty; bone mineral density; biochemical markers; migration

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this trial we studied the effect of pamidronate oil periprosthetic bone turnover and pelvic implant migration over 2 years after hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA). Twenty-two patients received 90 mg of pamidronate and 22 received placebo at randomization 5 days after surgery. Rapid periprosthetic bone loss Occurred in the placebo group over the first 6 months and was accompanied by transient increases in biochemical markers of bone turnover. Partial recovery in bone mass occurred in most re-mons after ibis period. No recovery of bone mass occurred at the femoral calcar or the medial wall of the acetabulum. Femoral calcar bone loss at 2 years was strongly predicted by acute biomarker changes at week 6. Pamidronate therapy reduced femoral bone loss in the region of the femoral calcar (P = 0.01) but did not affect pelvic bone loss. Pamidronate therapy also inhibited the transient rise in biochemical markers of bone turnover during this period. Pamidronate therapy did not affect acetabular cup migration. Cup migration was inversely related to subject age, but unrelated to initial post-operative bone mineral density, or subsequent bone loss. In summary, early periprosthetic bone loss is associated with a transient expansion of the bone remodeling space. Bisphosphonate therapy reduces femoral calcar bone loss and bone turnover after THA. but did not influence cup migration in ibis study. Acute changes in biochemical markers predict femoral periprosthetic bone loss. (C) 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available