4.5 Review

Confronting the issues of therapeutic misconception, enrollment decisions, and personal motives in genetic medicine-based clinical research studies for fatal disorders

Journal

HUMAN GENE THERAPY
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 1028-1036

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/hum.2005.16.1028

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR00047] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [U01 NS047458] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000047] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [U01NS047458] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic medicine-based therapies have unlocked the potential for ameliorating diseases previously considered inevitably fatal. Inherent in the clinical trials of genetic medicines are ethical issues of therapeutic misconception, enrollment decisions as they relate to the risks and benefits of research, and the complex relationships among funding sources, investigators, and the families of affected individuals. The purpose of this paper is to help define these complex issues relevant to the use of genetic medicines and to describe the strategy we have used to confront these issues in a phase I trial of adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer to the central nervous system of children with late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (LINCL), a fatal lysosomal storage disease associated with progressive neurodegeneration and death by mid-childhood. Our approach to these challenges should provide a useful paradigm for investigators initiating other genetic medicine-based studies to treat inevitably fatal diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available