4.3 Article

Benefits of a prehospital stroke code system - Feasibility and efficacy in the first year of clinical practice in Barcelona, Spain

Journal

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 96-101

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000082786

Keywords

stroke; code; thrombolysis; delay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives: Hospital admission delay is a main limiting factor for effective thrombolytic therapy in stroke patients. We developed a stroke code system for rapid request of emergency transportation to the hospital and a priority availability of the attending neurologist on the patient's arrival at the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: Over a 1-year period, a 24-hour telephone hotline between the attending neurologist and the Barcelona public emergency coordination service was established. Priority 1 ( P1) was defined as a patient with symptoms suggestive of acute stroke with onset of less than 3 h, in which case immediate transportation service and rapid ED reception was organized. Data from patients in the P1 group ( n = 39) and patients without activation of the stroke code ( P0) ( n = 181) were compared. Results: There were significant differences between P1 and P0 groups in mean time from ED arrival to request for neurologic assessment ( 4.4 +/- 19.5 vs. 194.7 +/- 244.9 min, p < 0.001), from arrival to neurologic examination ( 12.6 +/- 21.1 vs. 225.3 +/- 258.2 min, p < 0.005), and from arrival to performance of brain CT scan ( 35.5 +/- 34.9 vs. 120.3 +/- 143.2 min, p < 0.001), and also in the number of patients treated with thrombolytic agents ( 19 vs. 4.5%, p < 0.003). There were no differences between groups in the time elapsed from stroke onset to ED arrival. Conclusions: Activation of the stroke code was effective in increasing the percentage of patients treated with thrombolytic drugs and also in shortening the delay from ED arrival until neurologic assessment and from ED arrival until brain CT. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available