4.2 Article

Calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths. VIII. Data for 15 elemental solids over the 50-2000 eV range

Journal

SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 1-14

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sia.1997

Keywords

IMFP; electron inelastic mean free path; AES; XPS; TPP-2M equation; inelastic electron scattering; calculated IMFP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths (IMFPs) for 50-2000 eV electrons in 14 elemental solids (Li, Be, diamond, graphite, Na, K, Sc, Ge, In, Sn, Cs, Gd, Tb, and Dy) and for one solid (A1) using better optical data than in our previous work. The new IMFPs have also been used to test our TPP-2M equation for estimating IMFPs in these materials. We found surprisingly large root-mean-square (RMS) deviations (39.3-71.8%) between IMFPs calculated from TPP-2M and those calculated here from optical data for diamond, graphite and cesium; previously we had found an average RMS deviation of 10.2% for a group of 27 elemental solids. An analysis showed that the large deviations occurred for relatively small computed values of the parameter beta in the TPP-2M equation (beta similar to 0.01 for diamond and graphite) and also for relatively large values of beta (beta similar to 0.25 for Cs). Although such extreme values of beta are unlikely to be encountered for many other materials, the present results indicate an additional limitation in the reliability of the TPP-2M equation. We also show that the parameter N-v in the TPP-2M equation should be computed for the rare-earth elements from the number of valence electrons and the six 5p electrons. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available