4.5 Article

Promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management: evaluating a patient activation intervention

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 28-34

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.008

Keywords

diabetes self-management; patient activation; patient active involvement; expanding patient involvement in care

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [5-M01-RR-00044] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [1-R01-DK-50807] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000044] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK050807] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared an activation intervention to passive education in a randomized attention-control trial of 232 patients with type 2 diabetes. The activation intervention was based on Expanding Patient Involvement in Care (EPIC) trials, and was compared to time-matched passive education viewing of ADA video-tapes. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics of their diabetes were assessed with questionnaires, active involvement was assessed via ratings of taped interactions between patients and providers, and serum samples were analyzed for HbA1c. Patients in the activation condition were rated as more actively involved in discussions of diabetes self-management, and rated active involvement was predictive of improvement in glycemic control. No effect of the activation intervention was found on HbA1c. Thus, the activation intervention increased the active involvement of patients with type 2 diabetes in visits with practitioners, and active involvement led to improved glycemic control. However, the activation intervention did not improve glycemic control directly. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available