4.5 Article

Structural geology of a classic thrust belt earthquake: the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake Taiwan (M-w=7.6)

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 2058-2083

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.020

Keywords

active tectonics; thrust faulting; coseismic displacement; fault geometry; Chi-Chi earthquake; Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We document the structural context of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake (M-w = 7.6) in western Taiwan, which is one of the best-instrumented thrust-belt earthquakes. The main surface break and large slip (3-10 m) is on two segments of the shallow otherwise aseismic bedding-parallel Chelungpu-Sanyi thrust system, which shows nearly classic ramp-flat geometry with shallow detachments (1-6 km) in the Pliocene Chinshui Shale and Mio-Pliocene Kueichulin/Tungkeng Formations. However, rupture is complex, involving at least six faults, including a previously unknown deeper thrust (8-10 km) on which the rupture began. We compare the coseismic displacements with a new 3D map of the Chelungpu-Sanyi system. The displacements are spatially and temporally heterogeneous and well correlated with discrete geometric segments of the 3D shape of the fault system. Geodetic displacement vectors are statistically parallel to the nearest adjacent fault segment and are parallel to large-scale oblique fault corrugations. The displacement magnitudes are heterogeneous at several scales, which requires in the long term other non-Chi-Chi events or significant aseismic deformation. The Chelungpu thrust has a total displacement of similar to 14 km but the area of largest Chi-Chi slip (similar to 10 m) is on a newly propagated North Chelungpu Chinshui detachment (similar to 0.3 km total slip) which shows abnormally smooth rupture dynamics. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available