4.3 Article

Cell-Free Circulating DNA: A New Biomarker for the Acute Coronary Syndrome

Journal

CARDIOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages 76-84

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000345855

Keywords

Acute coronary syndrome; Alu; Biomarkers; Branched DNA assay

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation [81000775, 81201349]
  2. Medical Innovation Team and Leading Talent Project of the Jiangsu Province [LJ201133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In recent studies, concentrations of cell-free circulating DNA (cf-DNA) have been correlated with clinical characteristics and prognosis in several diseases. The relationship between cf-DNA concentrations and the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains unknown. Moreover, no data are available for the detection cf-DNA in ACS by a branched DNA (bDNA)-based Alu assay. The aim of the present study was to investigate cf-DNA concentrations in ACS and their relationship with clinical features. Methods: Plasma cf-DNA concentrations of 137 ACS patients at diagnosis, of 60 healthy individuals and of 13 patients with stable angina (SA) were determined using a bDNA-based Alu assay. Results: ACS patients (median 2,285.0, interquartile range 916.4-4,857.3 ng/ml), especially in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients (median 5,745.4, interquartile range 4,013.5-8,643.9 ng/ml), showed a significant increase in plasma cf-DNA concentrations compared with controls (healthy controls: median 118.3, interquartile range 81.1-221.1 ng/ml; SA patients: median 202.3, interquartile range 112.7-256.1 ng/ml) using a bDNA-based Alu assay. Moreover, we found positive correlations between cf-DNA and Gensini scoring and GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) scoring in ACS. Conclusion: cf-DNA may be a valuable marker for diagnosing and predicting the severity of coronary artery lesions and risk stratification in ACS. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available