4.3 Review

Reliability of statistical associations between genes and disease

Journal

IMMUNOGENETICS
Volume 57, Issue 8, Pages 549-558

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-005-0025-x

Keywords

genetics; genetic association; statistics; epidemiology; standards; linkage disequilibrium; quantitative trait loci

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA105417-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [HG001656-06] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH62009-05] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA105417] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [P20MH062009] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many statistical associations between a disease and alleles of specific genes have proven to be irreproducible. In part, this irreproducibility can be attributed to a lack of replication before publication and the fact that, until recently, the relationship between statistical significance and various measures of reproducibility was not widely understood. This review proposes a classification system, the Better Associations for Disease and GEnes (BADGE) system, for describing genetic associations. The BADGE classes, first class through fifth class, are based on the P value of the association. A first-class association, with P < 2x10(-7), is expected to be reproducible even in the absence of other evidence supporting the association. A fifth-class association corresponds to conventional statistical significance (P < 5x10(-2)), which provides almost no assurance of reproducibility. Three intervening classes, described as second-, third-, and fourth-class associations, are defined by P values separated by factors of 20 or 25 from these extremes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available