4.7 Article

Aroma profiles of pineapple fruit (Ananas comosus [L.] Merr.) and pineapple products

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 263-274

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2004.07.014

Keywords

Ananas comosus; aroma profile; HRGC-MS; methyl esters; furaneol; mesifurane; pineapple; volatile compounds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The flavour profile of juices made from fresh-cut pineapple fruits (n = 19; Costa Rica, Ghana, Honduras, Ivory Coast, Philippines, La Reunion, South Africa, Thailand) was studied in comparison to that of commercial water phases/recovery aromas (n = 16), juice concentrates (n = 10) as well as commercially available juices (n = 17). In addition, pineapple jams (n = 6; market samples) were investigated. HRGC-MS analysis of juices made from fresh-cut fruit revealed the known prevalence of esters, with methyl 2-methylbutanoate, methyl 3-(methylthio)-propanoate, methyl butanoate, methyl hexanoate, ethyl hexanoate and ethyl 3-(methylthio)-propanoate, as well as 2,5-dimethyl-4-methoxy-3(2H)-furanone (mesifurane) and 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)furanone (furaneol) as major constituents. A corresponding flavour profile was rarely found in water phases/recovery aromas under study. In most cases, the characteristic methyl esters and hydroxy or acetoxy esters were lacking completely or appeared only in minor amounts in these products. Whereas a few of the commercial single strength juices revealed fruit-related flavour profiles, juices produced from concentrates mostly exhibited a flavour composition similar to that of concentrates, i.e. they were predominantly determined by their contents of furaneol and did not show the fruit-related ester distribution. Similarly, the jams under study were poor in typical pineapple constituents. (C) 2004 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available