4.6 Review

Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical

Journal

TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 34-40

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD043078] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA014129] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [R01-HD043078] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [R01-DA14129, R21-DA01586] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In comparison with the ethical issues surrounding molecular genetics, there has been little public awareness of the ethical implications of neuroscience. Yet recent progress in cognitive neuroscience raises a host of ethical issues of at least comparable importance. Some are of a practical nature, concerning the applications of neurotechnology and their likely implications for individuals and society. Others are more philosophical, concerning the way we think about ourselves as persons, moral agents and spiritual beings. This article reviews key examples of each type of issue, including the relevant advances in science and technology and their accompanying social and philosophical problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available