4.6 Review

Pathogenesis of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Journal

RESPIROLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 2-8

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00694.x

Keywords

asbestos; mesothelioma; neurofibromatosis 2; simian virus 40; transgenic mice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) results from neoplastic transformation of mesothelial cells. Past asbestos exposure represents the major risk factor for MPM, as the link between asbestos fibres and MPM has been largely proved by epidemiological and experimental studies. Asbestos fibres induce DNA and chromosome damage linked to oxidative stress following phagocytosis. Recently, simian virus 40 (SV40) has been implicated in the aetiology of MPM. The origin of human infection has been associated with SV40- contaminated polio vaccines, although to date, no epidemiological data supports this hypothesis. SV40 may act as a coactivator of asbestos in mesothelial oncogenesis. The transforming potency of SV40 results from the activity of two viral proteins, large T and small t antigens. SV40 infection stimulates production of growth factors elsewhere implicated in autocrine growth of mesothelioma cells and inactivates RASSF1, a gene silenced in MPM. Roles for ionising radiation, chemicals or genetic factors have also been suggested from the observation of sporadic MPM cases or animal studies. Genetic alterations in the turnout suppressor genes, P16/CDKN2A and neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2), are found both in human MPM and in asbestos-exposed Nf2-deficient mice. MPM is still of great international concern. Despite a ban on asbestos use in Western countries, the incidence of MPM is increasing, due to the long delay between asbestos exposure and diagnosis. Moreover, asbestos is still used in developing countries. The implication of other risk factors, especially SV40, supports a need for further research into MPM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available