4.2 Article

Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in 60-to 64-year-old community-dwelling individuals: The Personality and Total Health through Life 60+study

Journal

DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
Volume 19, Issue 2-3, Pages 67-74

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000082351

Keywords

mild cognitive impairment; age-associated memory impairment; ageing-associated cognitive decline; mild neurocognitive disorder; clinical dementia rating

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This epidemiological study aimed at determining the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in 60- to 64-year-old individuals using different diagnostic criteria. Community dwelling individuals (n = 2,551) in the age range of 60 - 64 years were recruited randomly through the electoral roll. They were screened using the MMSE and a short cognitive battery, and those who screened positive underwent detailed medical and cognitive assessments. Extant MCI-related diagnoses were established by consensus. Predictive regression models on the sub-sample were used to determine population prevalence for the diagnoses. Of the 224 subjects who screened positive for MCI, 112 underwent a detailed assessment and 74% met the criteria for at least one recognised diagnosis of mild cognitive deficit ( MCI and related diagnoses). By predictive regression modelling, the prevalence of any MCI diagnosis was 13.7% (95% CI 9.1 - 30.2) in the population of 60- to 64-year- olds. The estimated prevalence rates for specific diagnoses were: MCI 3.7%, ageing-associated cognitive decline 3.1%, Clinical Dementia Rating score (0.5) 2.8%, age-associated memory impairment 1%, other cognitive disorders 0.9%, and mild neurocognitive disorder 0.6%. Agreement on 'caseness' between various proposed diagnoses was at best fair and generally poor. Memory and other cognitive problems not meeting the threshold for dementia are relatively common in 60- to 64-year- old individuals living in the community. The prevalence rate varies up to six-fold according to the diagnostic criteria applied, with limited overlap between diagnoses. There is an urgent need for standardization of the criteria. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available