4.6 Article

FOXM1 mediates Dox resistance in breast cancer by enhancing DNA repair

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages 1843-1853

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgs167

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. intramural faculty fund of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  2. MEST of Korea [2011-0001047]
  3. Shared Research Equipment Assistance
  4. National Institutes of Health [RC2GM092599, U54 CA151668, CA128797]
  5. Department of Defense [BC085265]
  6. National Institutes of Health through Cancer Center Support Grant [CA016672]
  7. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation [2011-0001047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transcription factors are direct effectors of altered signaling pathways in cancer and frequently determine clinical outcomes in cancer patients. To uncover new transcription factors that would determine clinical outcomes in breast cancer, we systematically analyzed gene expression data from breast cancer patients. Our results revealed that Forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) is the top-ranked survival-associated transcription factor in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Surprisingly, silencing FOXM1 expression led breast cancer cells to become more sensitive to doxorubicin (Dox). We found that FOXM1-dependent resistance to Dox is mediated by regulating DNA repair genes. We further demonstrated that NFB1 interacts with FOXM1 in the presence of Dox to protect breast cancer cells from DNA damage. Finally, silencing FOXM1 expression in breast cancer cells in a mouse xenograft model significantly sensitized the cells to Dox. Our systematic approaches identified an unexpected role of FOXM1 in Dox resistance by regulating DNA repair genes, and our findings provide mechanistic insights into how FOXM1 mediates resistance to Dox and evidence that FOXM1 may be a promising therapeutic target for sensitizing breast cancer cells to Dox.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available