4.6 Article

Knockout of HIF-1α in tumor-associated macrophages enhances M2 polarization and attenuates their pro-angiogenic responses

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 1863-1872

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgq088

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB815, BR999, GRK757]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) constitute major infiltrates of solid tumors and express a marker profile that characterizes alternatively activated macrophages (Ms). TAMs accumulate in hypoxic tumor regions, express high amounts of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and contribute to tumor angiogenesis and invasiveness. However, the precise role of HIF-1 on M infiltration and phenotype alterations remains poorly defined. Therefore, we cocultured wild type (wt) versus HIF-1 alpha(-/-) Ms with tumor spheroids. Both, wt and HIF-1 alpha(-/-) Ms, infiltrated hypoxic regions of tumor spheroids at equal rates and got alternatively activated. Interestingly, significantly higher amounts of HIF-1 alpha(-/-) Ms expressed the TAM markers CD206 and stabilin-1 compared with wt phagocytes. Stimulation of infiltrated TAMs with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/interferon-gamma revealed a reduced expression of the pro-inflammatory markers interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and inducible nitric oxide synthase in HIF-1 alpha(-/-) Ms. Furthermore, HIF-1 alpha(-/-) Ms were less cytotoxic toward tumor cells. Although infiltration of Ms increased the invasive potential of tumor spheroids independently of HIF-1, the ability to stimulate differentiation of stem cells toward CD31-positive cells was triggered by wt but not by HIF-1 alpha(-/-) Ms. Our data suggest that HIF-1 alpha-deficient Ms develop a more prominent TAM marker profile accompanied by reduced cytotoxicity, whereas HIF-1 seems indispensable for the angiogenesis-promoting properties of TAMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available