4.4 Article

Classifying web metrics using the web quality model

Journal

ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 227-248

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/14684520510607560

Keywords

worldwide web; quality; measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to classify the most important metrics proposed for web information systems, with the aim of offering the user a global vision of the state of the research within this area. Design/methodology/approach - WQM distinguishes three dimensions related to web features, lifecycle processes and quality characteristics. A range of recently published (1992-2004) works that include web metrics definitions have been studied and classified within this model. Findings - In this work, a global vision of web metrics is provided. Concretely, it was found that about 44 percent of metrics are related to presentation and that most metrics (48 percent) are usability metrics. Regarding the life cycle, the majority of metrics are related to operation and maintenance processes. Nevertheless, focusing on metrics validation, it was found that there is not too much work done, with only 3 percent of metrics validated theoretically and 37 percent of metrics validated empirically. Practical implications - The classification presented tries to facilitate the use and application of web metrics for different kinds of stakeholders (developers, maintainers, etc.) as well as to clarify where web metric definition efforts are centred, and thus where it is necessary to focus future works. Originality/value - This work tries to cover a deficiency in the web metrics field, where many proposals have been stated but without any kind of rigour and order. Consequently, the application of the proposed metrics is difficult and risky, and it is dangerous to base decisions on their values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available