4.7 Article

Evaluation of finite element based analysis of 3D multicrystalline aggregates plasticity - Application to crystal plasticity model identification and the study of stress and strain fields near grain boundaries

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 691-722

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.017

Keywords

crystal plasticity; finite element; heterogeneities; HCP materials; grain boundaries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plastic heterogeneities of hexagonal close-packed (HCP) materials are numerically investigated at the grain level. Intensive use of parallel Finite Elements computations enables us to study micro-plasticity of realistic 3D multicrystalline aggregates, including, macroscopic mechanical responses but also average responses in each grain and particularly local stress and strain fields. This paper focuses on three applications of this simulation method. The first part of this paper is devoted to a fine analysis of micro-plasticity of HCP materials. Intergranular but also intragranular stress and strain heterogeneities are described and micro-plasticity patterns are displayed throughout the 3D microstructures. A special attention is paid to the sensitivity of simulations with respect to the mesh discretization, the element interpolation and the geometrical representation of grain boundaries, in terms of macroscopic and local responses. Later, a simplified homogenization method is evaluated, regarding results of the first part. Afterwards, this method is applied with a zirconium alloy to identify a set of coefficients for a single crystal plasticity model. Finally, in order to provide critical information for intergranular damage phenomena (reported in literature for zirconium alloys), the third part provides a statistical analysis of over-stresses at grain boundaries. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available