4.3 Article

Fish oil decreases oxidative DNA damage by enhancing apoptosis in rat colon

Journal

NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 166-175

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1207/s15327914nc5202_7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA061750, U01CA057030, R37CA057030, R01CA057030, R01CA082907, R01CA059034] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P30ES009106] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [CA57030, CA61750, R01 CA059034, CA59034, CA82907] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIEHS NIH HHS [5P30-ES09106, P30-ES09106] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine if dietary fish oil protects against colon cancer by decreasing oxidative DNA damage at the initiation stage of colon tumorigenesis, oxidative DNA damage, proliferation, and apoptosis were assessed by colonic crypt cell position using quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), Ki-67, and TUNEL assay, respectively. Sixty rats were provided one of two diets (corn oil or fish oil) and dextran sodium sulfate (DSS, an inducer of oxidative DNA damage) treatments (no DSS, 3% DSS, or DSS withdrawal). Fish oil feeding resulted in lower 8-OHdG levels (P = 0.038), higher levels of apoptosis (P = 0.035), and a lower cell proliferative index (P = 0.05) compared with corn oil feeding. In the top third of the crypt, fish oil caused an incremental stimulation of apoptosis with increased DNA damage (P = 0.043), whereas there was no such relationship with corn oil. Because polyps and tumors develop from DNA damage that leads to loss of growth and death control, the significant difference in fish oil vs. corn oil on these variables may account, in part, for the observed protective effect of fish oil against oxidatively induced colon cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available