4.1 Article

Community development of free-living aquatic nematodes in littoral periphyton communities

Journal

NEMATOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 901-916

Publisher

BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1163/156854105776186352

Keywords

age structure; benthos; feeding types; freshwater; hard substrates; morphological adaptations; nematode species composition; passive transport; temporal patterns

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of an epilithic nematode Community and the mode of colonisation was monitored over a 57-day period during spring in a field experiment in the littoral zone of a large oligotrophic lake. Two types of experimental units were used: one type prohibited direct colonisation via active crawling by elevating substrates into the water column and the second type had substrates placed on the lake bottom. Data from the two types of units and from nearby natural hard substrates were compared. The nematodes quickly colonised on the introduced substrates and reached maximum densities of 123 individuals per 10 cm(2) after 57 days. Nematode densities on elevated and non-elevated substrates did not differ significantly. The nematode abundance and community Structure showed a large initial variation, but became more stable over time and resembled the natural community structure at the end of the experiment. The maximum number of nematode species was reached after 2 weeks of colonisation, with a maximum species number on days 12 and 14 in the experimental units and on day 19 on the surrounding natural hard substrates. The five numerically dominant species, Eumonhystera vulgaris, Chromadorina bioculata, Eumonhystera filiformis, Chromadorina viridis and Daptonema dubium, accounted for most of the variation between the different communities. The results indicate that water-column transport was the main colonisation pathway of epilithic nematodes. The distribution of nematode species points to potential morphological adaptations of some species for persistence on hard substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available