4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Stress-induced enhancement of fear learning: An animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1207-1223

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.010

Keywords

fear conditioning; freezing; learning; PTSD; sensitization; stress

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [R24AT002681] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH062122] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCCIH NIH HHS [R24 AT002681] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH62122] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fear is an adaptive response that initiates defensive behavior to protect animals and humans from danger. However, anxiety disorders, such as Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), can occur when fear is inappropriately regulated. Fear conditioning can be used to study aspects of PTSD, and we have developed a model in which pre-exposure to a stressor of repeated footshock enhances conditional fear responding to a single context-shock pairing. The experiments in this chapter address interpretations of this effect including generalization and summation or fear, inflation, and altered pain sensitivity. The results of these experiments lead to the conclusion that pre-exposure to shock sensitizes conditional fear responding to similar less intense stressors. This sensitization effect resists exposure therapy (extinction) and amnestic (NMDA antagonist) treatment. The pattern predicts why in PTSD patients, mild stressors cause reactions more appropriate for the original traumatic stressor and why new fears are so readily formed in these patients. This model can facilitate the study of neurobiological mechanisms underlying sensitization of responses observed in PTSD. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available