4.8 Article

Pitfalls in the characterization of sulfur/carbon nanocomposite materials for lithium-sulfur batteries

Journal

CARBON
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 245-255

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.065

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BASF Scientific Network for Electrochemistry and Batteries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The preparation of sulfur/carbon composite materials for lithium-sulfur batteries is currently a very active research field. Thereto, nanoporous carbon materials are mixed with or infiltrated by sulfur to provide a close contact between both compounds. The characterization of these often complex and on the nanoscale structured composite materials is usually done by vacuum based methods such as nitrogen physisorption or scanning electron microscopy, for example. In this study we show that results from these measurements can be misinterpreted. The reason is the volatility of sulfur that leads to a rapid migration and continuous redistribution effects, especially at low pressures and/or elevated temperatures. For nitrogen physisorption this means that virtually identical isotherms are found for S-8/C samples, irrespective of their pre-treatment, making it impossible to prove intentional nanostructuring by pore filling. Similar effects are found for scanning electron microscopy studies where sulfur migration and contamination of originally sulfur free samples is evidenced in situ. Further evidence is provided by macroscopic experiments combined with elementary analysis. The results show that characterizing the structure of S-8/C composite materials or electrodes is very challenging. In addition, the observed rapid sulfur redistribution might also have important consequences for the performance of practical lithium-sulfur batteries. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available