4.3 Article

Effect of dietary intake of phytoestrogens on estrogen receptor status in premenopausal women with breast cancer

Journal

NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 162-169

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1207/s15327914nc5102_6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA70264] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA070264] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although many dietary studies have focused on breast cancer risk, few have examined dietary influence on tumor characteristics such as estrogen receptor (ER) status. Because phytoestrogens may modulate hormone levels and ER expression, we analyzed ER status and phytoestrogen intake in a case-case study of 124 premenopausal breast cancer patients. We assessed intake with a food-frequency questionnaire and obtained ER status from medical records. Rather than focusing on risk, we evaluated whether low intakes were more strongly associated with ER-negative tumors than with ER-positive disease. In logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders, threefold greater risks of ER-negative tumors relative to ER-positive tumors were associated with low intake of the isoflavones genistein (odds atio, OR = 3.50; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.43-8.58) and daidzein (OR = 3.10; 95% CI = 1.31-7.30). Low intake of the flavonoid kaempferol (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.16-0.83), the trace element boron (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.13-0.83), and the phytosterol beta-sitosterol (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18-0.98) were associated with decreased risk of ER-negative tumors relative to ER-positive disease. Other phytoestrogens were not significantly associated with ER status. Thus, in premenopausal patients, some phytoestrogens may affect breast carcinogenesis by influencing ER status. Such findings suggest new directions for mechanistic research on dietary factors in breast carcinogenesis that may have relevance for prevention and clinical treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available