4.4 Article

Axotomy-induced early down-regulation of POU-IV class transcription factors Brn-3a and Brn-3b in retinal ganglion cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 17-25

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/JMN:26:1:017

Keywords

RGCs; axotomy; optic nerve transection; Brn-3; neuronal apoptosis; transcription factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been proposed that neurons being exposed to proapoptotic stimuli undergo dedifferentiation, a process that can either allow for regeneration and axon regrowth or, if remaining incomplete, can force the cell to activate apoptotic pathways. A pivotal step in the differentiation program from neuronal precursor cells to differentiated, postmitotic neurons is their exit from the cell cycle. The POU domain transcription factors Brn-3b and Brn-3a, which are expressed in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) directly after the exit of RGC precursors from the cell cycle, can be employed as RGC-specific differentiation markers to study potential dedifferentiation of RGCs after axotomy. Here, we examined mRNA and protein expression of Brn-3a and -3b in rat RGCs following axonal lesion. We observed a rapid down-regulation of Brn-3a and -3b protein expression in axotomized RGCs, clearly preceding apoptosis of RGCs. Using real-time PCR, we show that regulation of Brn-3 expression occurred at the transcriptional level. The small subset of RGCs regenerating into a peripheral nerve graft did not (re-)express Brn-3a or -b. In conclusion, we found further evidence supporting the hypothesis of a dedifferentiation process in severed mature neurons. As Brn-3b expression has been shown to be a prerequisite for developmental survival of most RGCs and Brn-3a activates transcription of anti-apoptotic genes, down-regulation of Brn-3 transcription factors might be causally involved in the secondary death of adult RGCs following axotomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available