4.8 Article

Effects of pyrolysis temperature on the chemical composition of refined softwood and hardwood lignins

Journal

CARBON
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 531-537

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.087

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDA National Needs Graduate Fellowship Competitive Grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2007-38420-17782]
  2. NIFA [2011-67009-20049]
  3. NIFA [2011-67009-20049, 579886] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  5. Division Of Graduate Education [0947962] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study uses nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy to investigate the evolution of refined softwood and hardwood lignins under various pyrolytic exposures. Little chemical change occurred at pyrolysis temperatures of 250 and 300 degrees C, whereas significant mass loss and chemical change was observed at 400 and 500 degrees C. These losses were mainly attributed to evolution of methoxyl, hydroxyl, and propyl groups. Mass loss plateaued following pyrolysis at 500 degrees C, but rearrangements continued to occur at higher temperatures, resulting in char that became increasingly polyaromatic in nature. Following brief pyrolytic exposures at 500 and 600 degrees C, the refined hardwood and softwood lignins yielded coal-like products. Lignin pyrolyzed at higher temperatures yielded chars with greater order, similar in composition to coke. These coal and coke-like products are called lignin-based carbon (LBC). The polyaromatic nature of the LBC after high temperature pyrolysis was perceived as the result of radical formation and recombination, leading to fused aromatic structures, which occurs more readily at higher temperatures. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available