4.8 Article

Scalable preparation of three-dimensional porous structures of reduced graphene oxide/cellulose composites and their application in supercapacitors

Journal

CARBON
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 501-509

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.049

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hundred Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21274158]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controlling the assembled structures of graphene has recently attracted enormous attention due to intriguing properties of the resultant structures. In this study, three-dimensional (3D) porous structures of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with various ratios of RGO to cellulose have been fabricated by a scalable, but simple and efficient, approach that consists of ball milling assisted chemical reduction of GO, template shaping, coagulating, and lyophilization. The efficient mechanical shearing of ball milling and the hydrogen bond interactions between RGO and cellulose molecules contribute to the formation of a homogeneous RGO/cellulose hydrogel, improved thermal stability of the resultant composites, and enhanced crystallinity of the cellulose in the composites. The coagulation effect of cellulose maintains the RGO sheets in the 3D structures of cellulose; on the other hand, the RGO sheets facilitate the preservation of the 3D structures during freeze-drying, leading to the formation of 3D porous structures of RGO/cellulose composites. Benefiting from the continuous RGO network in the composites, the 3D porous structures of RGO(70)/cellulose(100) (GO:cellulose = 70:100 in weight) show an electrical conductivity of 15.28 S m(-1). Moreover, the 3D porous structures show potential application in supercapacitors due to the fact that they provide high specific surface area and fast charge propagation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available