4.8 Article

In situ transmission electron microscope tensile testing reveals structure-property relationships in carbon nanofibers

Journal

CARBON
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 246-253

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ARO through MURI [W911NF-09-1-0541]
  2. MRSEC program at the Materials Research Center, program of the National Science Foundation [NSF DMR-0520513]
  3. Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center, program of the National Science Foundation [EEC-0118025/003]
  4. State of Illinois
  5. Northwestern University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tensile tests were performed on carbon nanofibers in situ a transmission electron microscope (TEM) using a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) tensile testing device. The carbon nanofibers tested in this study were produced via the electrospinning of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) into fibers, which are subsequently stabilized in an oxygen environment at 270 degrees C and carbonized in nitrogen at 800 degrees C. To investigate the relationship between the fiber molecular structure, diameter, and mechanical properties, nanofibers with diameters ranging from similar to 100 to 300 nm were mounted onto a MEMS device using nanomanipulation inside the chamber of a Scanning Electron Microscope, and subsequently tested in tension in situ a TEM. The results show the dependence of strength and modulus on diameter, with a maximum modulus of 262 GPa and strength of 7.3 GPa measured for a 108 nm diameter fiber. In particular, through TEM evaluation of the structure of each individual nanofiber immediately prior to testing, we elucidate a dependence of mechanical properties on the molecular orientation of the graphitic structure: the strength and stiffness of the fibers increases with a higher degree of orientation of the 0 0 2 graphitic planes along the fiber axis, which coincides with decreasing fiber diameter. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available