4.0 Article

Winter foraging strategy of white-tailed deer at the northern limit of its range

Journal

ECOSCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 476-484

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.2980/i1195-6860-12-4-476.1

Keywords

browse selection; energy budget; Odocoileus virginianus; snow locomotion constraints; winter physiological adaptations

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In winter ungulates must compete for forage of low quality that may be energetically costly to obtain due to high locomotion costs associated with snow. We hypothesized that white-tailed deer would select plant species and plant parts to maximize their net energy budget based on snow conditions and forage availability. We predicted that as winter progress or under deep snow conditions, deer would 1) reduce selectivity, 2) enlarge bite size, and 3) increase cropping rate. For three winters, we studied white-tailed deer found in the Pohenegamook wintering area (southeastern Quebec), at the northeastern periphery of the species range. Utilization rates of plant species varied in relation to fibre contents but were not related to protein, ash, or phenolic contents, suggesting that energy represented the key nutritive element during winter. Deer were less selective as winter progressed and snow depth increased. Deer consumed all available plant species, but their foraging strategy was centred around deciduous twigs; deer were reluctant to increase the amount of coniferous twigs in their diet. However, snow conditions affected diet composition. During a very mild winter, deer reduced their intake of balsam fir and consumed some species that were likely unavailable when snow was deep. Bite size increased over the winter, whereas cropping rate increased with snow sinking depth. To cope with changing locomotion costs in snow, white-tailed deer adjusted three variables: travelling distance, forage intake, and cropping rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available