4.5 Article

Chemical composition design of superalloys for maximum stress, temperature, and time-to-rupture using self-adapting response surface optimization

Journal

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 569-590

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1081/AMP-200053592

Keywords

alloy design; evolutionary optimization; inverse problems; material design; multiobjective optimization; superalloys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have adapted an advanced semistochastic evolutionary algorithm for constrained multiobjective optimization and combined it with experimental testing and verification to determine optimum concentrations of alloying elements in heat-resistant austenitic stainless steel alloys and superalloys that will simultaneously maximize a number of the alloy's mechanical properties. The optimization algorithm allows for a finite number of ingredients in the alloy to be optimized so that a finite number of physical properties of the alloy are either minimized or maximized, while satisfying a finite number of equality and inequality constraints. Alternatively, an inverse design method was developed, which uses the same optimization algorithm to determine chemical compositions of alloys that will be able to sustain a specified level of stress at a given temperature for a specified length of time. The main benefits of the self-adapting response surface optimization algorithm are its outstanding reliability in avoiding local minimums, its computational speed, ability to work with realistic nonsmooth variations of experimentally obtained data and for accurate interpolation of such data, and a significantly reduced number of required experimentally evaluated alloy samples compared with more traditional gradient-based and genetic optimization algorithms. Experimentally preparing samples of the optimized alloys and testing them have verified the superior performance of alloy compositions determined by this multiobjective optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available