4.0 Article

Cardiovascular responses in unrestrained WKY rats to inhaled ultrafine carbon particles

Journal

INHALATION TOXICOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 29-42

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08958370590885681

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on epidemiologic observations, the issue of adverse health effects of inhaled ultrafine particles (UFP) is currently under intensive discussion. We therefore examined cardiovascular effects of UFP in a controlled animal exposure on young, healthy WKY rats. Short-term exposure ( 24 h) to carbon UFPs ( 38 nm, 180 mug m(-3)), generated by spark discharging, induced a mild but consistent increase in heart rate ( 18 bpm, 4.8%), which was associated with a significant decrease in heart-rate variability during particle inhalation. The timing and the transient character of these responses point to a particle induced alteration of cardiac autonomic balance, mediated by a pulmonary receptor activation. After 24 h of inhalation exposure, bronchoalveolar lavage revealed significant but low-grade pulmonary inflammation ( clean air 1.9% vs. UFPs 6.9% polymorphonuclear cells) and on histopathology sporadic accumulation of particle-laden macrophages was found in the alveolar region. There was no evidence of an inflammation-mediated increase in blood coagulability, as UFP inhalation did not induce any significant changes in plasma fibrinogen or factor VIIa levels and there were no prothrombotic changes in the lung or the heart at both the protein and mRNA level. Histological analysis revealed no signs of cardiac inflammation or cardiomyopathy. This study therefore provides toxicological evidence for UFP-associated pulmonary and cardiac effects in healthy rats. Our findings suggest that the observed changes are mediated by an altered sympatho-vagal balance in response to UFP inhalation, but do not support the concept of an inflammation-mediated prothrombotic state by UFP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available