4.8 Article

A comparison of the effect of graphitization on microstructures and properties of polyacrylonitrile and mesophase pitch-based carbon fibers

Journal

CARBON
Volume 50, Issue 12, Pages 4459-4469

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.05.024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB605602, 2011CB605603]
  2. National Special Fund for Forestry Scientific Research in the Public Interest [201004057]
  3. Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project from Ministry of Education of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and mesophase pitch (MPP)-based carbon fibers were heat treated in the temperature range of 1300-2700 degrees C. After high-temperature heat treatment (HHT), the microstructures and mechanical properties of PAN and MPP-based carbon fibers were investigated. For both series of carbon fibers, the Young's modulus increased with heat treatment temperature increasing. The tensile strength of PAN-based carbon fibers decreased, while that of MPP-based carbon fibers increased. After HHT at 2700 degrees, the tensile strength of MPP-based carbon fibers exceeded that of PAN-based carbon fibers. The results could be ascribed to the variously original structures and the different routines of structural evolution. The physical entanglements and covalent cross-links of carbon ribbons in PAN-based carbon fibers contributed to a higher shear stress between the graphene layers, however, tended to generate voids and cracks during HHT due to an extensive transformation from turbostratic to ordered structure along with nitrogen removing. For MPP-based carbon fibers, they displayed a radial texture with ordered and parallel packing of layers in the transverse section. Thus, it was easier for the graphene layers to stack and bond to the adjacent ones without strong rotations, leading to fewer voids and cracks. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available