4.7 Article

A system for brain tumor volume estimation via MR imaging and fuzzy connectedness

Journal

COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 21-34

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.07.008

Keywords

brain tumor; image segmentation; magnetic resonance imaging; fuzzy connectedness; volume measurement; visualization

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR 46902] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 37172] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR046902] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS037172] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method for the precise, accurate and efficient quantification of brain tumor (glioblastomas) via MRI that can be used routinely in the clinic. Tumor volume is considered useful in evaluating disease progression and response to therapy, and in assessing the need for changes in treatment plans. We use multiple MRI protocols including FLAIR, T1, and T1 with Gd enhancement to gather information about different aspects of the tumor and its vicinity. These include enhancing tissue, nonenhancing tumor, edema, and combinations of edema and tumor. We have adapted the fuzzy connectedness framework for tumor segmentation in this work and the method requires only limited user interaction in routine clinical use. The system has been tested for its precision, accuracy, and efficiency, utilizing 10 patient studies. The percent coefficient of variation (% CV) in volume due to operator subjectivity in specifying seeds for fuzzy connectedness segmentation is less than 1%. The mean operator and computer time required per study for estimating the volumes of both edema and enhancing tumor is about 16 min. The software package is designed to run under operator supervision. Delineation has been found to agree with the operators' visual inspection most of the time except in some cases when the tumor is close to the boundary of the brain. In the latter case, the scalp, surgical scar, or orbital contents are included in the delineation, and an operator has to exclude this manually. The methodology is rapid, robust, consistent, yielding highly reproducible measurements, and is likely to become part of the routine evaluation of brain tumor patients in our health system. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available