4.3 Article

Long-term results of lamivudine monotherapy in Korean patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: Response and relapse rates, and factors related to durability of HBeAg seroconversion

Journal

INTERVIROLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 341-349

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000086061

Keywords

chronic hepatitis B; lamivudine; antiviral response; HBeAg seroconversion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the long-term effects of lamivudine in 461 Korean patients with chronic hepatitis B who were treated for more than 12 months. Methods: The annual rates of virological response and breakthrough were examined and the predictive factors for post-treatment relapse in 114 patients who achieved hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss or seroconversion after lamivudine therapy were also analyzed. Results: During follow-up, the rates of HBeAg seroconversion after 1,2,3,4 and 5 years of treatment were 22.9, 33.2, 47.6, 54.2 and 58.8%, respectively, while those for virological breakthrough at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years were 8.2, 41.7, 55.7 and 64.8%, respectively. Ninety-five patients (20.6%) had HBeAg seroconversion and 19 (4.1%) showed HBeAg loss alone with disappearance of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum. Seroconversion was higher with prolonged treatment in patients who had elevated serum alanine aminotransferase. The cumulative relapse rates in the seroconversion group were 52.0 and 55.7% 1 and 2 years after treatment, respectively. Age and the duration of additional treatment were significant predictive factors for post-treatment relapse. Patients aged <= 40 who had additional treatment for >12 months after seroconversion had the lowest relapse rate (p<0.001). Conclusions: These results suggest that additional treatment for over 12 months after HBeAg seroconversion in younger patients may produce a better long-term outcome. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available