4.6 Review

Culture and symptom reporting at menopause

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 495-512

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmi018

Keywords

culture; local biology; menopause; methodology; symptom reporting

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [F31AT001041] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCCIH NIH HHS [F31 AT01041-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the present paper is to review recent research on the relationship of culture and menopausal symptoms and propose a biocultural framework that makes use of both biological and cultural parameters in future research. Medline was searched for English-language articles published from 2000 to 2004 using the keyword 'menopause' in the journals-Menopause, Maturitas, Climacteric, Social Science and Medicine, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Journal of Women's Health, Journal of the American Medical Association, American Journal of Epidemiology, Lancet and British Medical Journal, excluding articles concerning small clinical samples, surgical menopause or HRT. Additionally, references of retrieved articles and reviews were hand-searched. Although a large number of studies and publications exist, methodological differences limit attempts at comparison or systematic review. We outline a theoretical framework in which relevant biological and cultural variables can be operationalized and measured, making it possible for rigorous comparisons in the future. Several studies carried out in Japan, North America and Australia, using similar methodology but different culture/ethnic groups, indicate that differences in symptom reporting are real and highlight the importance of biocultural research. We suggest that both biological variation and cultural differences contribute to the menopausal transition, and that more rigorous data collection is required to elucidate how biology and culture interact in female ageing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available