4.8 Article

High power supercapacitors using polyacrylonitrile-based carbon nanofiber paper

Journal

CARBON
Volume 47, Issue 13, Pages 2984-2992

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.06.051

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MOE through STAR-faculty
  2. KOSEF through CNNC at SKKU
  3. Norit (The Netherlands)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0093844] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous carbon nanofiber paper has been obtained by one-step carbonization/activation of PAN-based nanofiber paper at temperatures from 700 to 1000 degrees C in CO2 atmosphere. The paper was used as supercapacitor electrode without any binder or percolator. At low temperature, e.g., <= 900 degrees C, nitrogen enriched carbons with a poorly developed specific surface area (S-BET <= 400 m(2)/g) are obtained. in aqueous electrolytes, these carbons withstand high current loads without a noticeable decrease of capacitance, and the normalized capacitance reaches 67 mu F/cm(2). At 10 s time constant, the values of energy and power densities are 3-4 times higher than for activated carbons (AC) presenting higher specific surface area. By carbonization/activation at 1000 degrees C, subnanometer pores are developed and S-BET = 705 m(2)/g. Despite moderate BET specific surface area, the capacitance reaches values higher than 100 F/g in organic electrolyte. At high power densities, the nanofiber paper obtained at 1000 degrees C outperforms the energy density retention of ACs in organic electrolyte. The high power capability of the carbon nanofiber papers in the two kinds of electrolytes is attributed both to the high intrinsic conductivity of the fibers and to the high diffusion rate of ions in the opened mesopores. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available