4.6 Review

Is self special? A critical review of evidence from experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages 76-97

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.76

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG014082, K02AG000756] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA014129] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG-14082-04, K02 AG-00756-04] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA14129] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Varied research findings have been taken to support the claim that humans' representation of the self is special, that is, that it emerges from systems that are physically and functionally distinct from those used for more general purpose cognitive processing. The authors evaluate this claim by reviewing the relevant literatures and addressing the criteria for considering a system special, the various operationalizations of self, and how the studies' findings relate to the conclusions drawn. The authors conclude that many of the claims for the special status of self-related processing are premature given the evidence and that the various self-related research programs do not seem to be illuminating a unitary, common system, despite individuals' subjective experience of a unified self.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available