4.5 Article

Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and leptin on hypothalamic mRNA expression of factors participating in food intake regulation in a TCDD-sensitive and a TCDD-resistant rat strain

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR TOXICOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 139-148

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbt.20065

Keywords

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; leptin; rat; hypothalamus; food intake; neuropeptides; gene expression; strain differences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An acutely toxic dose of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) leads to a drastically and permanently reduced feed intake and wasting by an unknown mechanism. We focused on the possible interference of TCDD with hypothalamic factors known to take part in the regulation of eating and metabolism, utilizing the over 1000-fold TCDD-sensitivity difference between Long-Evans (Turku/AB; L-E) and Han/Wistar (Kuopio) rats. The mRNA expression of 18 hypothalamic factors (including NPY, AgRP, and CART) was measured by quantitative RT-PCR at 6, 24 and 96 h after TCDD administration. The effects of TCDD were compared with those of leptin and with feed restriction employing a TCDD dose that elicited a severe reduction of feed intake in L-E rats. TCDD mainly modified expression of orexigenic factors causing an initial suppression followed by reversal to enhanced expression by 96 h. The latter was also seen in feed-restricted controls. In contrast, leptin altered both orexigenic and anorexigenic factor mRNAs in a more even manner and its effects were clustered at 6 h. The transient nature of feeding-promoting factor suppression does not strongly support a key role for this phenomenon in TCDD-induced wasting syndrome. However, the fact that TCDD mainly affected orexigenic factors and the temporal differences in response found between the rat strains warrant further research. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available