4.5 Article

Iodine and halocarbon response of Laminaria digitata to oxidative stress and links to atmospheric new particle production

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 282-290

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/EN05078

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/B501104/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in the halocarbon, I(2) and particle production of the brown algal kelp Laminaria digitata as a response to different chemical stresses have been investigated. Oxidative stress (caused by either exogenous hydrogen peroxide, gaseous ozone or a solution of oligoguluronates, known elicitors of oxidative stress) caused increased halocarbon and I(2) production by the seaweed. The maximum I(2) release was observed under exposure to O(3) (at several hundred parts per billion by volume (ppbv)), whereas oligoguluronates elicited the highest release of iodine-containing halocarbons including CH(2)I(2). Significantly greater production of I(2), compared to CH(2)I(2), was observed at atmospheric levels of ozone. Particle production was observed only when the Laminaria samples were exposed to ozone (up to 16000 cm(-3) s(-1) per gram fresh weight (FW) of seaweed with a similar to 2 min residence time and with a total I atom flux of 1.6 x 10(8) cm(-3) s(-1) g(-1) FW from photolysis of I(2)); passing O(3)-free air over the unstressed seaweed followed by secondary mixing with ozone did not result in any measurable particle formation. Our limited data indicate that ozone elicits abiotic production of I(2) from Laminaria and that there is a direct relationship between the amount of I(2) released and the number of particles formed. The results support the recent hypothesis that molecular iodine rather than volatile organic iodine (e.g. CH(2)I(2)) release from exposed seaweeds is the major source of coastal new particle production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available