4.0 Article

The development of endogenous orienting: Control over the scope of attention and lateral asymmetries

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 237-255

Publisher

LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.1207/s15326942dn2702_3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD35466] Funding Source: Medline
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P01HD035466] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the development of endogenous orienting in children ages 6, 10, and 14 years and in adults. Participants were asked to respond with a button press to targets appearing in the left or right visual field. Cues that correctly or incorrectly indicated the target's location preceded the appearance of targets at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 100 and 800 msec. Cues that signaled a target's appearance, but not its location, were also included. In addition to raw reaction times, orienting effects, benefits, and costs were examined. Two main findings emerged: First, for all participants except the youngest children effect sizes increased with increasing SOA. The absence of an SOA effect in the youngest group is interpreted as evidence of their difficulty in voluntarily adjusting the scope of their attentional focus. In addition, field asymmetries changed with the age of the respondent: 6-year-olds showed a right-field advantage, 10-year-olds failed to show any laterality differences, and 14-year-olds and adults responded more quickly to targets in the left than in the right field. This finding is consistent with developmental data on a number of cognitive processes, and is interpreted within a developmental framework of right-hemisphere dominance for spatial orienting (cf. Mesulam, 1998).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available