4.1 Article

The Pittsburgh common cold studies: Psychosocial predictors of susceptibility to respiratory infectious illness

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 123-131

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1203_1

Keywords

psychoneuroimmunology; socioeconomic status; stress buffering; social integration; social rank; social support; infectious illness susceptibility; respiratory infections; common cold; influenza; cytokine regulation; cortisol regulation

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P50HL065112, P50HL065111] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI023072] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH047234, R01MH050429] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides a selected overview of 20 years of research on the role of psychosocial factors in susceptibility to upper respiratory infections. We present evidence from our laboratory that psychological stress is associated with increased risk for developing respiratory illness for persons intentionally exposed to a common cold virus, that the longer the duration of the stressor the greater the risk, and that stress association with susceptibility may be mediated by stress-induced disruption of the regulation of proinflammatory cytokines. We further provide evidence that social relationships (social integration and social support) are also associated with risk for respiratory illness: Social integration is associated with reduced risk irrespective of stress level and social support protects persons from the pathogenic influences of stress. Finally, we report recent evidence that lower levels of early childhood socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with greater risk of viral-induced illness during adulthood, independent of adult SES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available