3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Intracellular signaling of lipid mediators via cognate nuclear G protein-coupled receptors

Journal

ENDOTHELIUM-JOURNAL OF ENDOTHELIAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 1-2, Pages 63-72

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1080/10623320590933815

Keywords

caveolae; endothelial cells; G proteins; gene transcription; localization; LPA; PAF; receptors; signaling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) are ubiquitous lipid mediators that play important roles in inflammation, cardiovascular homeostasis, and immunity and are also known to modulate gene expression of specific proinflammatory genes. The mechanism of action of these phospholipids is thought to be primarily dependent on their specific plasma membrane receptors belonging to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, increasing evidence suggests the existence of a functional intracellular GPCR population. It has been suggested that immediate effects are mediated by cell surface receptors, whereas long-term responses are mediated by intracellular receptors. PAF and LPA(1) receptors localize at the cell nucleus of cerebral microvascular endothelial cells of newborn pig, rat hepatocytes, and cells overexpressing each receptor, and stimulation of isolated nuclei reveal biological functions, including transcriptional regulation of major genes, namely cylooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase. This mini review focuses on the nuclear localization and signaling of GPCRs, recognizing PAF and LPA phospholipids as ligands. Theories on how nuclear PAF and LPA(1) receptors activate gene transcription and nuclear localization pathways are discussed. Intracrine signaling for lipid mediators uncover novel pathways to elicit their effects; moreover, intracellular GPCRs constitute a distinctive mode of action for gene regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available