4.1 Article

Plant volatiles affect oviposition by codling moths

Journal

CHEMOECOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 77-83

Publisher

BIRKHAUSER VERLAG AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00049-005-0295-7

Keywords

Cydia pomonella; Tortricidae; Lepidoptera; plant volatile compounds; Hopkins' host selection principle; Malus; Pyrus; Juglans

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oviposition in wild codling moth females, collected as overwintering larvae from apple, pear and walnut, was stimulated by volatiles from fruit-bearing green branches of these respective hostplants. Analysis of head-space collections showed that eight compounds present in apple, pear and walnut elicited a reliable antennal response in codling moth females: (E)-beta-ocimene, 4,8-dimethyl-1,(E)3,7-nonatriene, (Z)3-hexenyl acetate, nonanal, P-caryophyllene, germacrene D, (EE)-alpha-farnesene, and methyl salicylate. Any one of these compounds is found in many other non-host plants, and host recognition in codling moth is thus likely encoded by a blend of volatiles. A large variation in the blend proportion of these compounds released from apple, pear and walnut suggests a considerable plasticity in the female response to host plant odours. Wild females, collected as overwintering larvae in the field, laid significantly fewer eggs in the absence of host plant volatiles. The offspring of these females, however, reared on a semi-artificial diet in the laboratory, laid as many eggs with or without plant volatile stimulus. Tests with individual females showed that this rapid change in oviposition behaviour may be explained by selection for females which oviposit in the absence of odour stimuli, rather than by preimaginal conditioning of insects when rearing them on semi-artificial diet. Oviposition bioassays using laboratory-reared females are therefore not suitable to identify the volatile compounds which stimulate egglaying in wild females.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available