4.7 Article

How composition and process parameters affect volatile active compounds in biopolymer films

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 646-656

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.012

Keywords

Chitosan film; Drying; Aroma retention; Partition coefficient; Temperature; Moisture

Funding

  1. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  2. Ministere de l'Economie, de l'Industrie et de l'Emploi [09 290 6395]
  3. Conseil Regional de Bourgogne, General Directorate for Competitiveness, Industry and Services DGCIS, Conseil regional Franche-Comte, Conseil Regional Picardie, Conseil General Cote d'Or, Conseil General Jura, le Grand Dijon
  4. Competitive Clusters Vitagora, IAR et Plastipolis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active edible films based on chitosan and containing an active aroma compound have been investigated. The influence of the composition of the film forming solution (solvent, plasticizers, nanoparticles, emulsifiers and aroma traps) and process parameters (temperature and viscosity) on drying kinetics, water content, colour, aroma compound retention and partition coefficient was studied. Solvent evaporation rate was increased by addition of ethanol. Water evaporation was delayed by glycerol. The aroma retention during film drying was directly related to the water content. The drying temperature had opposite influences according to the composition of the solvent and additives. Increasing temperature from 20 to 100 degrees C could increase 3 times the retention of aroma compounds. The viscosity of film forming solutions was strongly increased by biopolymer content and glycerol but reduced by carvacrol and ethanol. To improve carvacrol retention, the most efficient additive was gum arabic, followed by glycerol whereas the effect of nanoclays or emulsifiers remained weak. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available