4.7 Article

The role of cotyledon cell structure during in vitro digestion of starch in navy beans

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 1678-1688

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.075

Keywords

Navy beans; Microstructure; Cotyledon cells; Cooking; In vitro starch hydrolysis; Beans digesta; Storage; High pressure treatment

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Innovation [MAUX0703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies on the physico-chemical, microstructural characteristics and in vitro (under simulated gastric and small intestine conditions) starch digestibility of navy beans were carried out. The microstructure of raw and cooked beans observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed the presence of hexagonal or angular shaped cotyledon cells (50-100 mu m size) containing starch granules with a size ranging between 10 and 50 mu m. The extent of starch hydrolysis (%) after 120 min of in vitro gastro-intestinal digestion differed between whole navy beans (similar to 60%) and milled bean flour and bean starch (85-90%) after they were cooked under similar conditions. Starch hydrolysis (%) increased significantly when the cotyledon cells in the cooked whole navy beans were disrupted using high pressure treatment (French press). The storage of freshly cooked whole beans resulted in a lower (40-45%) starch hydrolysis whereas re-heating increased the same to 70-80% during in vitro small intestinal digestion. The SEM pictures of cooked navy bean digesta after different intervals of in vitro gastric and small intestinal digestion showed that the cotyledon cell structure is maintained well throughout the digestion period. However cotyledon cells appear shrunken and developed wrinkles during in vitro digestion. Particle size analysis of cooked bean paste taken before and after the in vitro gastro-intestinal digestion showed similar particle size distributions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available