4.7 Article

Effect of clay contents on mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of agar-based nanocomposite films

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 691-699

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.010

Keywords

Agar; Nanocomposite films; Clay content; Mechanical properties; Water vapor barrier properties

Funding

  1. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Korea
  2. Institute of Planning & Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (iPET), Republic of Korea [IPET710003-3] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-521-F00050] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agar/clay (Cloisite Na+) nanocomposite films with different amount of the nanoclay (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 20 g clay/100 g agar) were prepared using a solution intercalation method. Results on X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed well developed intercalated nanocomposite films especially at low level of nanoclay addition, and their properties were greatly influenced with the clay content. Tensile strength (TS) increased with increase in the clay content up to 10%, and decreased with more than 10% of clay incorporation. Water vapor permeability (WVP), water vapor uptake ratio (WVUR5), and water solubility (WS) decreased with increase in the nanoclay content due to the tortuous path for water vapor diffusion and strong structure formed between the intercalated silicate layers and the polymer matrix. Hydrophilicity of the nanocomposite films increased with increase in the hydrophilic nanoclay, resulted in decreased water contact angle (CA) and increased swelling ratio (SR). (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available