4.7 Article

Characteristics of amine-crosslinked wheat straw and its adsorption mechanisms for phosphate and chromium (VI) removal from aqueous solution

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 1054-1060

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.069

Keywords

Phosphate; Chromate (VI); Wheat straw; Raman shift; Adsorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50878121, 21007034]
  2. Foundation for Young Excellent Scientists in Shandong Province [BS2009NY005]
  3. National Major Special Technological Programmes Concerning Water Pollution Control and Management in the Eleventh Five-year Plan Period [2008ZX07010-008-002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new adsorbent was prepared from wheat straw (WS) after the crosslinking of amine groups. Its adsorption characteristics and operating parameters for phosphate and chromium (VI) removal were studied. BET surface area, elemental content and zeta potential analysis illustrated the physicochemical change between amine-crosslinked wheat straw (AC-WS) and WS. Significant variation in Raman shift of phosphate/chromium (VI)-loaded AC-WS was observed, and the results suggested the differential adsorption mechanisms for phosphate and chromate (VI) removal by AC-WS. The adverse effect of ionic strength on phosphate and chromate (VI) uptake suggests the possibility of ion exchange mechanisms being active in the adsorption process. The regeneration capacities for phosphate-loaded AC-WS and chromium (VI)-loaded AC-WS were 98.1% and 74.8%, respectively, which validated a potential chemical bonding between chromium (VI) and AC-WS. In addition, the adsorption capacities of AC-WS for phosphate and chromate (VI) were 1.71 and 5.68 mmol/g, respectively, providing a potential application of AC-WS for toxic heavy metals and nutrient substances removal from aqueous solutions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available